ella_menno: (dean and bobby by keb91)
ella_menno ([personal profile] ella_menno) wrote2007-09-29 11:49 am

the angels and the devils are within us

HELLO INTERNETS I HAVE MISSED YOOOOOOOOOOU!!

Yeah, so, a little trouble with the connectivity earlier this week. Hmph.

Item the first:

Okay, I knew that when we put the kids in school, our budget would be affected – obviously, there’s the tuition. And I knew we’d be paying for hot lunches as well.

But there are just so many incidental expenses that I either forgot about or had no idea existed! Field trips! Fundraisers! Snack money! Milk money (because that’s separate from lunch money – who knew?)! Class parties! School-wide parties! Extracurricular activities! Basketball! Cub Scouts! And the Scouts/sports have their own set of fundraisers!

It’s just. Yeesh. It kind of piles up, and I feel like I’ve done nothing so much as write checks to the school for the past four weeks, and I don’t really see it tapering off anytime sooon.

Oh well; it was past time to revamp the budget, anyway. *sigh*




Item the second: not only did I miss Smallville’s season premiere on Thursday night – I didn’t even care about it. Really, the only thing I actually missed was talking to my girls during the commercials. [Which I would’ve done, had I
a) not been at a fundraiser;
2) remembered it was Thursday;
and/or D) received your voicemail prior to,oh, about an hour ago. Pfft.]


It’s kind of amazing to me when I remember a few years ago, how SV was, like, the Huge Fannish Love of My Life*, and now I’m not only not watching it, I’m not even trolling around online so that I can catch up with what happened. (Though I do gather that rumors of Lana’s demise were greatly exaggerated, to which I have to say: wow. Could I be less surprised? *thinks* Nope; not really.)




Item the third: Mom and I joined an exercise program. Yay, us. Not that y'all really care, but I do have to mention this one teeny fact – on the information sheet we had to fill out before joining, the very last question was along the lines of “give two reasons you want to get into better shape.”

I don’t remember what I ACTUALLY wrote down, but I do know that my immediate impulse was to write down Jensen Ackles and Jared Padalecki. Now you tell me – is that so wrong?

Erm. Maybe?




Item the fourth: I tend to jot down stuff in a variety of notebooks that end up scattered all over everywhere. Just found one that must’ve been stuck somewhere for a couple of months, ‘cause it has a bunch of ideas and such that were obviously sparked by AHBL ½, at the end of last season.

Here are a few:

- is a soul a “good” or a “service”? a piece of property? a state of being?

-in general, who is the legal owner of a soul? Who owns Dean’s soul right now?

- does the demon have the right and/or authority to purchase and/or barter for souls? For that matter, does Dean?

- what are the exact terms of the deal Dean made?

-what can invalidate a verbal contract of the type Dean made with the demon?

-what law, if any, is the contract subject to? Is there any higher authority that can be consulted if any part of the deal is in question?

Which reminds me, I would really love to read a story wherein the demon comes to collect and can’t (I know, you’re thinking there are a hundred of those already!) – except the reason the demon can’t take possession of Dean's soul is because it legally belongs to the Impala. *smiles*

Back to your weekends, people!

I love it!

[identity profile] katelennon.livejournal.com 2007-09-30 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
This technicality soul stuff is teh awesome!

If Sam was "brought" back with additional bits, ie, evil/demony extras, could one conclude that Dean's Sam was not brought back and thus the terms of the original bargain were not met? Remember- Dean wanted "Sam" back from the dead. Could the addition of him being back 'wrong' (which, btw is sooo Buffy, it makes me a little cranksy)be enough of a failure to meet the contractual obligation as set out in the original agreement to invalidate said agreement?


I love technicalities.

Re: I love it!

[identity profile] ella-menno.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 06:22 am (UTC)(link)
Mmmm, technicalities. I bet they taste like chicken.

Could the addition of him being back 'wrong' [snip] be enough of a failure to meet the contractual obligation as set out in the original agreement to invalidate said agreement?

This? Is the kind of thoughtful, introspective, meta-tastic stuff someone OUGHT to be writing. Now we just have to figure out who that person is. Harumph.

I vote you. I can't write, but I plot very, very well..

[identity profile] katelennon.livejournal.com 2007-10-02 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Y'know, the more I think about this, the more I think that if Dean can prove that Sam was not in fact, the original Sam, that this might actually be a very convincing argument. However, to whom would he appeal? Obviously the cross-toards demon is prejudiced; is there a bi-annual meeting of an impartial group that would listen to his complaint? Should there be one? It would actually be beneficial to both parties where there an independent governing body.